Gergiev shakes the LSO through Prokofiev and Dutilleux

Prokofiev, Dutilleux: Leonadas Kavakos (violin), London Symphony Orchestra, Valery Gergiev (conductor), Royal Albert Hall, 23.08.2011 (CG) 

Prokofiev: Symphony no 1 in D (“Classical”) Op 25 (1916)
Henri  Dutilleux:  L’Arbre des Songes  (1985)
Henri  Dutilleux: Slava’s Fanfare (1977)
Prokofiev: Symphony no 5 in Bb Op 100 (1944)

The two composers featured tonight are two of Gergiev’s favourites; he has performed and recorded Prokofiev’s works extensively, and has been making a welcome feature of performing Dutilleux’s music too. In all the works on tonight’s schedule, therefore, the LSO and its chief conductor should be well rehearsed.

It was a little disappointing to find Gergiev with his head in the score for Prokofiev’s “Classical” symphony, then, and even more disappointing to find the first movement being taken rather clumsily, and certainly well on the slow side of allegro. The ensemble playing was noticeably a little imprecise – not surprising because Gergiev seems to think it okay to shake his fingers in the air rather than provide the splendid LSO with a firm beat in music which demands the utmost precision. Things fared a little better in the second movement which was not without charm, but sank into ponderousness again with the third. The breakneck speed of the final movement could perhaps have been breathlessly exciting had Gergiev given the orchestra a really firm beat, and the LSO certainly deserve praise for keeping the tempo going at such a lick, but once again there was a lot of disconcerting shaking of fingers and not much direction, and finally I felt it was far too rushed to be anything but rather thrown-away. The performance was not without some strong points; there were some individually delightful contributions from the woodwind, and one sensed that there was a superb performance just around the corner. How frustrating!

Dutilleux fared much better, as one might expect with the outstanding violinist, Leonadas Kavakos, on stage for L’Arbre des Songes. Although dressed in a designer suit and now with copious amounts of jet-black hair, he is naturally modest and plays with astonishing musicality – his tone in this work was not massive, but absolutely convincing in its sense of line, phrase and sure intonation. This has long been a favourite work of mine, with its exotic orchestral colours breathing everything French, and the LSO rose to the occasion with superbly judged interplaying between soloist and orchestra, and a particularly outstanding contribution from Christine Pendrill in the notoriously difficult oboe d’amore solos. How the piece constantly unfolds its tree of dreams with a continual development of melodic phrases, always surprising yet somehow logical, is a source of wonder. Moreover, the orchestration of this piece, an integral part of the composition of course, is absolutely gorgeous; sensuously beautiful, but frequently acidic – rather like a superb Sancerre or Montrachet with twists of lemon from the cimbalom and delicately tinkling percussion. A delightful surprise was the crystal clarity with which everything sounded in the often chaotic acoustic of the Albert Hall. Fabulous music, superbly performed. 

The rarely performed Slava’s Fanfare, composed for the 70th birthday of Mstislav Rostropovich, proved to have many of Dutilleux’s hallmarks – perhaps a fanfare that only Dutilleux could write. A lot of interplay between the trumpets and trombones precedes a brief reference to Dvorak’s Cello Concerto – and then suddenly it’s all over. An interesting four-minute novelty, brief and very much to the point.

The Fifth Symphony of Prokofiev, a big undertaking for any orchestra or conductor, was described by Prokofiev as "a hymn to free and happy Man, to his mighty powers, his pure and noble spirit." He added that it clamoured for expression - “it filled my soul." Composed towards the end of the 2nd World War, in a safe place provided by the State, it is the composer’s reaction to world events; nevertheless, it is also tight in its construction, and is by turns darkly dramatic, nostalgically emotional, and ironically witty.
It is no mean feat to judge the tempi and character of the various trains of thought effectively; this performance certainly had impressive moments of suitably dark drama and there was much to admire in the LSO’s characteristically incisive performance generally. But here again, Gergiev’s waffly rather than sure direction provided too many opportunities for the orchestra to break ranks. The horns came adrift near the beginning, and there were other brief moments of uncertainty. This would not happen in other hands and although one cannot question Gergiev’s seriousness of purpose and magnetic presence, question marks concerning the basic essential function of a conductor continue to trouble this reviewer very deeply. Why stand there shaking and waving your fingers when the orchestra desperately needs a proper BEAT??? Gergiev has become simply one of the most irritating conductors to watch and how an orchestra follows him remains a mystery to me. Extraordinary, considering his starry status. 

Christopher Gunning
August 23, 2011 |

The Proms celebrate Sir Richard Rodney Bennett’s 75th birthday

Sir Richard Rodney Bennett, Henri Dutilleux, Elizabeth Maconchy: Paul  Silverthorne (viola), London Sinfonietta, Nicholas  Collon (conductor), Cadogan Hall, 13.8.2011 (CG)  

Richard Rodney Bennett: Dream Dancing  (1986)
Henri  Dutilleux: Les citations (1985-1990)
Maconchy:  Romanza (1979)
Richard Rodney Bennett: Jazz Calendar (1964)

Sir Richard Rodney Bennett is celebrating his 75th birthday this year, and this was one of two Proms to include his music, the other being the Film Music Prom on August 12th, in which his music for “Murder on the Orient Express” was included. I can’t help feeling it a great pity the BBC couldn’t have pulled out some more stops for this extraordinarily talented composer; could we not have had one of his three symphonies, or one of his many concertos, or even one of his works for choir and orchestra, such as Epithalamion? One is spoilt for choice; Bennett has displayed an almost Mozartean prolificacy and counts as one of the most natural-born composers ever. Nowadays he prefers to live in New York, and loves to play and sing jazz and accompany his favourite singers, and consequently his output as a composer has slowed. Interestingly, it has also undergone a stylistic change; his music is more tonally based and less strident than it was following his studies with Pierre Boulez. Bennett would say he’s “grown up,” but it would be a terrible shame to dismiss the music he wrote through the 70’s and 80’s - it is choc-a-bloc full of inventive expression and yet always eminently playable and approachable. Let’s not forget the fantastic impression his early opera The Ledge made in 1961, or The Mines of Sulphur in 1963, in which he developed an expressionist technique sometimes reminiscent of Alban Berg, or the three symphonies, which demonstrate his development as a symphonic composer.

If one has to be content with relatively small mercies, this afternoon’s concert at least presented two very different sides of Bennett’s output; Dream Dancing is one of his “serious” works from the mid 80’s whereas Jazz Calendar is a set of jazzy pieces for an ensemble of 12 jazz players, composed to a commission from the BBC.  

Bennett’s starting point for Dream Dancing was the later music of Debussy, which he has always loved. The ensemble, consisting of flute, oboe/cor anglais, clarinet/bass clarinet, bassoon, horn, trumpet, harpsichord,  piano/celesta, harp, violin, viola, cello and double bass, is even inspired by Debussy’s late sonatas; the French composer had intended to write a series of six sonatas for small chamber groups, but only finished three. Bennett includes the intended instruments of the unwritten pieces, as well as the finished works. There are other influences of Debussy pervading Bennett’s score – Syrinx for solo flute, and reminiscences of other pieces, such as Masques (1904) which provides the rhythmic basis of the second movement. But this music doesn’t sound like Debussy; it is composed in Bennett’s freely wandering semi-atonal style, which, being the superb musician he is, always has harmony and harmonic momentum. The performance was excellent from the fluently autumnal nature of the first movement to the more jumpy, rhythmic character of the second, and Sir Richard, sitting in the audience, looked very happy.

The French theme continued with the second piece; Dutilleux composed the first part of Les Citations in 1985 when composer-in-residence at the Aldeburgh Festival, and it contains a brief reference to Peter Grimes by way of homage to Peter Pears. Then, in 1990, he composed the second movement, and added a double bass to the instrumental ensemble of oboe, percussion and harpsichord. There is a quotation from one of Dutilleux’s composer-colleagues who was killed in action during World War II, Jehan Alain, and another quotation from a theme and variations by Alain with a motif ascribed to Janequin used in one of his organ pieces. This seldom performed piece makes considerable demands of the four players. It is composed with Dutilleux’s acute ear much in evidence, and, as always with Dutilleux, there is plenty for the listener to hang on to, even when the music becomes extremely intense. Gareth Hulse negotiated the extraordinarily difficult oboe part with panache, and the ensemble between all four players was immaculate; it was a marvellous performance.

Next came an opportunity for Paul Silverthorne to display his command of the viola in the hugely neglected Elizabeth Maconchy’s Romanza, with a chamber ensemble of five wind instruments with string quartet and double bass. Bennett has enduring respect and admiration for Maconchy’s music, and the two became good friends until her death in 1994. Here we were in a predominantly “autumnal” mood again, the viola weaving long expressive lines over a richly orchestrated backdrop, but there’s much variety here too, and a good deal of contrapuntal writing. It is difficult to understand why Maconchy’s music is not better known – it is attractive, expressive, and superbly crafted. For those who do not know the string quartets (there are no less than thirteen) I can thoroughly recommend them!

All change on the platform, and now the London Sinfonietta suddenly became an ensemble of top London jazz musicians. Jazz Calendar is in seven movements inspired by the nursery poem “Monday’s Child” and became one of Sir Richard’s best known works when it was taken up in 1968 by Sir Frederick Ashton and the Royal Ballet, and performed at the Royal Opera House for about ten years. Now on the platform and in conversation with Christopher Cook, the composer explained how he admired the arranging skills of Marty Paich and Gil Evans, and wanted to incorporate some of their techniques into his piece. It’s not crossover music; it has nothing to do with the movement called “Third Stream,” which sought to combine the best of classical and jazz; it is straight-ahead jazz of a relatively comfortable kind which a great many people find hugely enjoyable. It’s expertly done, and this afternoon it was expertly played. And it was lovely to see a beaming Sir Richard on the platform afterwards receiving the enormously enthusiastic applause.

Christopher Gunning
August 13, 2011 |